The Lesson Learned: The Push for "Traditional Roles" and the Childcare Crisis
Why Returning to Outdated Gender Roles Ignores the Real Struggles Families Face Today
There’s been a significant rise in the idea of women returning to "traditional roles" in society, as recently reported by The New York Times. According to their findings, almost half of Republican men now believe that women should step back into more traditional domestic roles, a number that has more than doubled since 2022. The sentiment among Republican women has also shifted, with 37% now agreeing, up from 23% just two years ago. While this change in perspective might seem surprising, the underlying reasons for it are deeply rooted in the struggles that women face in today’s economy.
Source: New York Times
For many women, the pressure to return to traditional roles doesn’t come from a desire to reject equality—it comes from sheer exhaustion. Women are navigating a system that was never designed for them, where they battle systemic barriers in the workplace, deal with rampant sexism, and struggle with the lack of paid leave and affordable childcare. They’re burnt out, overwhelmed, and, in many cases, unsupported at home. For some, the idea of stepping away from the workforce and embracing a more traditional role feels like a way out—a chance to escape the stresses of balancing work and family. But this perspective ignores the harsh realities of what such a decision would mean for financial stability.
The suggestion that women should leave their jobs to care for children at home seems to come from a place of nostalgia for an idealized past that never really existed. As the New York Times reports, Republican men are increasingly calling for women to return to traditional roles, but this doesn’t reflect a true understanding of the financial strain families are under. In today’s economy, living on a single income is not only difficult—it’s often impossible. The rising cost of childcare is forcing families to make tough choices, and many are sacrificing essential expenses, or even the ability to save for the future. If women were to leave the workforce, most families would be left struggling to pay basic bills and support their children's futures.
Moreover, the growing appeal of "tradwife" content, which romanticizes a return to the home, fails to acknowledge the long-term financial security issues women face when they leave the workforce. Women who step away from their careers often find themselves without retirement savings, Social Security contributions, or emergency funds, making them vulnerable in the event of unexpected life changes, like a divorce, the death of a partner, or a job loss. The reality is that staying home to care for children isn’t just about returning to an outdated gender role—it’s about making an incredibly difficult financial sacrifice that limits women’s independence and security.
This push to return to traditional roles ignores the real problem: a lack of adequate support for families, particularly in the form of accessible, affordable childcare and paid parental leave. The idea that women should just leave their jobs and stay at home in order to solve this issue is short-sighted. It suggests that women’s place is in the home, yet it fails to recognize that the true issue lies in the failure of our systems to provide the support families need to thrive.
As we’ve seen, the economic reality for most families today is that two incomes are required just to make ends meet. Women working outside the home isn’t just a personal choice; it’s a necessity for financial survival. The conversation around women and work shouldn’t focus on returning to outdated gender roles—it should focus on creating systems that support working families, including affordable childcare, paid leave, and workplace protections.
The bottom line is this: The real solution to the challenges women and families face isn’t about pushing women back into the home—it’s about recognizing the systemic barriers they face and creating policies that support all families. Women have always worked, whether paid or unpaid. The issue isn’t whether women should work, but whether they have the freedom to do so without sacrificing their financial security, their health, or their family’s well-being.
As the conversation around traditional roles heats up, it’s crucial to remember that the fight isn’t about going back to a time that never truly existed—it’s about ensuring women can thrive in the workforce, and at home, without facing the overwhelming burden of an unsupportive system.
In Other News…
If you want to hear more from me this week, here's where you can find me:
My Audio Course is on Presale!
For those of you who are feeling the weight of the mental load and want practical strategies to shift the balance in your home, my audio course is officially on presale!
I’ve been feeling the pull of the tradwife movement, despite being well aware of all the challenges you share here and someone who derives great meaning and purpose from their career. But I am exhausted, and it feels like a false dichotomy of choosing my kids or my career.
Wel said! The tradwife movement is society throwing up their hands, instead of continuing to fight for resources and system changes for women. Asking women to retreat is like pushing the “easy button” because “seeing” and “hearing” them means hard work for men and society in general.